An excerpt from the book Homo
Imitans by Leandro Herrero:
The crowd is group contagion on a larger scale
and with broader borders. Crowd behaviour has been studied from many angles and
in a nutshell, two streams are apparent. People join a crowd because of a
conscious or unconscious, rational or irrational affinity to something or the
desire to behave in a particular way.
This is called convergent theory. But the
crowd itself, for whatever reason, also makes people behave in a particular
way. This is called contagion theory. You can see that both are possible and
likely to appear together. Homo Imitans has some characteristics that make him
find affinity with others (convergence). Once inside the crowd or large social
group, he can see others ‘going with the flow’. It’s a visible phenomenon. And
so, he will become infected by the collective behaviour (contagion), which will
reinforce his belonging to the crowd. But there is a third element. The
collective itself may also create its own emergent and somehow invisible rules.
This trio of crowd rules also explains quite a lot of what is going on inside
organizations even if strictly speaking organizations are not crowds. People
may join an organization because they want to be part of it. There may be many
reasons. Once inside, ‘the organization joins them’.
Now, some crowds are one-off phenomena, others
are transitory, some recurrent (civil rights protests) and some are established
rituals (religious gatherings). In some crowds the stability is often precarious.
The crowd’s own rules can be broken very easily by small deviations,
particularly if Homo Imitans has ‘converged’ from different ‘positions’ and
uses the crowd as a vehicle of expression. In crowd mode, sometimes all it
takes is a minority of rule-breakers to exacerbate hidden emotions in Homo
Imitans. The anti-Iraq war demonstrations in the UK and other parts of the
world saw enormous (largely selforganized) crowds composed of a variety of
unlikely companions. On the surface, they all had the anti-war theme in common,
but the motivations behind their anti-war stance and the ‘crowd-joining’
mechanisms were extremely diverse. The crowd, which can have its own personality
and emotions, is the perfect social copier and amplifier. An old classification
of primal emotions is useful here4. It is said that if the
dominant emotion is fear, the crowd could convert it into panic. If it’s craze,
the crowd produces joy. If it’s anger, the crowd breeds hostility.
Incidentally, I believe my parents may have
inadvertently been very fond of the convergent theory, as they often used the Spanish
expression ‘Dios los cria y ellos se juntan’. This translates
roughly as ‘God creates them and then they get together’, pretty much meaning
people always seem to be able to find likeminded people and associate themselves
with those. The English say ‘birds of a feather flock together’, but in my
parents’ opinion that always meant something more. It meant trouble...
For more visit www.viralchange.com
No comments:
Post a Comment