An excerpt from the book Homo
Imitans by Leandro Herrero:
If the Social Sciences teach us anything, it
is about our incredible plasticity, which we are always more ready to
attribute to others than to ourselves. And this fantastic capacity
is precisely the good/bad news to consider. Bad news à la Iraq,
good news à la all the possible good that roles and uniforms
could provide in daily life. And since most of our daily life is
spent at work, all the above applies to management and leadership. The
problem is that management science has developed thick
membranes, as if it needed to protect itself from intrusions by
Psychology, Sociology and the other Sciences de l’Homme. Milgram and
Zimbardo are not taught in business schools, but I can’t
think of a better starting point to discuss leadership.
Back to the news. Another article I read was
cynical about the ‘new’ Iraqi police. The occupying forces had
finally realized there was no option but to bring back the old police
force and the military that had been disbanded. The
columnist joked about “seeing the old moustaches and the old faces back” and could not understand how we should expect new behaviour
from them. Most people would sympathize with this point
of view but the tiny minority that belongs to the Social Psychology
tribe would have no problem accepting it. If the context
changes (and, indeed, it
has) this police force may surprise people
with its ability to comply with the new regime. A change of uniform and
context may create some good, even with the old
moustaches. Similarly, providing a positive context in organizations
(this is the leader’s function) makes roles and uniforms
constructive. The same roles—managers, directors, project leaders,
heads of HR and vicepresidents— in a negative context create havoc.
The key is the existence or absence of
agreement on nonnegotiable behaviours, hopefully, but not necessarily,
linked to a value system. These non-negotiable behaviours
were probably absent in Abu Ghraib, or everything there was
possible and negotiable in a contingent way – that is,
depending on what needs to be achieved; for example, weakness in the
detainees. Contingent approaches in management and
leadership are wonderfully convenient and deeply dangerous,
not something that traditional business education is
prepared to accept. My unofficial father of contingent leadership is
Jack Welch, ex-CEO of General
Electric.
For more visit www.viralchange.com
No comments:
Post a Comment